Muslim Brotherhood agenda for the U.S., and the West.

Islamists Success in E.U.

Shari'ah ShowdownShari’ah Showdown

Very few individuals have been sounding the alarm of the Islamic invasion on the west and the U.S.  This agenda has been in the works since late sixties.  Yet, only within the last ten years the west is starting to open one eye, most went back to sleep.  Much of western governments have submitted to the demands of Shari’ah law and the Islamic agenda ofthe Muslim brotherhood.  Including the U.S. government.   Shari’ah Showdown, The video link shown above the results of a weak and open immigration policy, weak and almost non-existent Christian presence due to Belgian/European move towards secularism, and the decline of childbirth among native Europeans.  America better wake up and smell the burned coffee.  They must ignore the culture’s call for not having more children and stop the murder of the unborn.  Americans are killing their own way of life. Muslims will out birth Americans and convert this nation to Americastan.

Islamic Expansion Motivation 

Liberal media and U.S. Administration would try to sell the American people the lie that the Boston bombing was an isolated act led by two brothers who have hijacked their peaceful religion.  This policy is a detriment to our nation’s constitution, liberties, and way of life.

Marching in the streets of London demanding Shari’ah LawMarching in the streets of London demanding Shari’ah Law

One must look at Islam’s source and authority that is the Qur’an. Take time to understand its language:

Qur’an 9:29
“Fight those who do not profess the true faith (Islam) till they pay the jizya (poll tax) with the hand of humility…”

Meaning Muslims are to fight non-Muslims and humiliate them; who also must pay a retribution tax for their existence.

Qur’an 9:5
“Then, when the sacred months have passed, slay the idolaters wherever ye find them, and take them (captive), and besiege them and prepare for them each ambush. But if they repent and establish worship and pay the poor-due, then leave their way free. Lo! Allah is Forgiving, Merciful.”

Meaning kill the idolaters (non-Muslims) in any brutal way possible until they submit to Allah.

Qur’an / Repentance 9:73
Prophet, make war on the unbelievers and the hypocrites and deal rigorously with them. Hell shall be their Home: an evil fate.

This is a convenient divine justification, since “Allah” himself says that people of other religions belong in Hell, therefore, barbaric acts against the unbelievers is justified.

Qur’an 4:89

“If they do not accept Islam, seize them and kill them wherever you find them. Take no friends or helpers from their ranks.”

Quran 8:12-14

“I (Allah) will instill terror into the hearts of the infidels. Chop off their heads and cut off all their fingers because they did not believe in Allah and his apostle (Mohammed). If anyone does not believe in Allah and his apostle, Allah has the torment of the fire for them.”

Jihadists will fight the infidels to death:

  • Meanwhile American laws will protect Muslims.
  • Progressives and Leftist will support Muslims.
  • N.G.O.s will legitimize Muslims.
  • Counsel on Islamic Relations  will incubate Muslims.
  • The A.C.L.U. will empower Muslims.
  • Western Universities will educate Muslims.
  • Mosques will shelter Muslims.
  • Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries will finance Muslims.
  • Hollywood will love Muslims.


The Brotherhood writing on the wall

Muslim_Brotherhood_LogoMuslim Brotherhood

Since 9/11 the American government has been intentionally in denial to the fact that Islam is the greatest threat to America. Our government’s policy has been and still is a policy of appeasement and political correctness. It has been courting a number of Islamic organizations and they all have one thing in common: They are all members of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB).

Most Americans have a vague understanding of the scope of the threat MB poses on our nation and its people. Here are some facts:

MB Creed: “Allah is our goal; the Messenger is our guide: the Koran is our law; Jihad is our way; and martyrdom in the way of Allah our inspiration.”

Muslim Foundations that exist in America:

  • Muslim World League – Saudi Arabia
  • Muslim Students Association – 1962
  • Islamic Medical Association – 1967
  • Association of Muslim Scientists & Engineers ( AMSE– 1969)
  • Association of Muslim Social Scientists. (AMSS – 1972)
  • Muslim Arab Youth Association (MAYA)
  • Muslim Youth of N. America (MYNA)
  • N. American Islamic Trust (NAIT – 1973)

The call of the Muslim Brotherhood was based on two key pillars:

Hassan Al-Banna Founder of MBHassan Al-Banna
Founder of MB

The introduction of the Islamic Shari`ah as the basis controlling the affairs of state and society. 

  1. Work to achieve unification among the Islamic countries and states, mainly among the Arab states, and liberating them from foreign imperialism. 

Hassan Al-Banna has this vision for the world:

  1. “It is the nature of Islam to dominate, not to be dominated, to impose its law on all nations and to extend its power to the entire planet.” 
  2. “Jihad is an obligation from Allah Almighty on every Muslim and cannot be ignored nor evaded.”

The idea of building bridges with the Islamic world and these organization is very naive and dangerous.

Here is what Seyyid Qutb the father of modern day Jihad said about outreach: “The chasm between Islam and Jahiliyyah (non-Muslims) is great, and a bridge is not to be built across it so that the people on the two sides may mix with each other, but only so that the people of Jahiliyyah (non-Muslims) may come over to Islam. If not, then we shall say to them what God commanded His Messenger – peace be on him – to say: “For you your way, for me mine.”  (Qur’an 109:6)”



The current spiritual leader of the MB Sheikh Yusuf Qaradhawi said:

All of the Americans in Iraq are combatants, there is no difference between civilians and soldiers, and one should fight them, since the American civilians came to Iraq in order to serve the occupation. The abduction and killing of Americans in Iraq is an obligation so as to cause them to leave Iraq immediately. 2004

 Muslim Brotherhood Timeline

  • 1921-1922: Ottoman Empire Dissolved, Turkey Secularized
  • 1928: Muslim Brotherhood founded by Hasan al Banna outside Cairo, Egypt
  • 1948-1949: Egypt PM Nuqrashi killed; al Banna killed
  • 1954: Nasser survives assassination attempt
  • 1962-1963: MB establishes itself in US
  • 1981: Assassination of Sadat, MB Banned
  • 1982: ISNA formed, umbrella organization
  • 1987: Hamas formed, MB wing in Palestine
  • 1993: Philadelphia Meeting, Hamas/MB plan
  • 2001: Holy Land Foundation for Relief and Development Shut Down
  • 2004: El Barrasse Raid in VA
  • 2008: Holy Land Foundation Convicted in Dallas, TX.

Jihad at a new level

London Street JihadistLondon Street Jihadist

Jihadists in the west are taking their barbaric cause into the streets of western cities such as London with the killing of a British soldier.  It is happening in America as well. In Feb 2013 a Muslim man beheads two Christians in NJ, the mainstream media and our government are silent. Ticking Time Bomb, FOCUS, 9 Nov 2009, Ft Hood, San Antonio, TX, Maj. Nidal Malik Hasan, U.S.A.  committed Islamic Jihad killing 13, wounding 32 while shouted Praise Allah while standing on a table at a breakfast gathering.

Common Core

The Common Core academic level is lower than what many states use now, and the math standards are so inferior that the only real mathematician on the validation committee refused to sign off on the math standards. Parents will have a hard time helping their children with their math homework. CC standards call for teaching kids to add columns of figures

Common Core means government agencies will gather and store all sorts of private information on every schoolchild into a longitudinal database from birth through all levels of schooling, plus giving government the right to share and exchange this nosy information with other government and private agencies, thus negating the federal law that now prohibits that. This type of surveillance and control of individuals is the mark of a totalitarian government.”              Phyllis Schlafly.

American Exceptionalism is no longer taught, but evil American Imperialism is. Rather than teaching our kids to be thrifty, hardworking and self-reliant, they are taught government dependency.  CC promotes Islam as a religion of peace and that Allah and the Almighty God are the same. Our children have been indoctrinated to accept Islam and reject Christianity.

America is slipping away from our hands with our permission due to our lack of involvement in the political, economic, social, and moral arenas. American citizens can stop this if they are active in protecting the freedoms our forefathers and thousands of Americans fought for.  It is our generation to preserve what many died for us to enjoy.

USA today said that in 20 years the Muslim population in the U.S. would double.                         



American Mosques are off limits for the FBI, WHY?

In light of the revelation of NSA spying on every American citizens’ communication wether phone or email, an American citizen must ask few questions:

First, why would the NSA need to do this? The answer we have been getting from the Obama’s administration is that it is necessary to stop Jihadist from attacking the U.S.

Second, due to the Obama administration directive to remove any reference of Jihad, Islamic terrorism, and Islam from any training manuals of counter terrorism training at the FBI. Then, why would they claim that spying on the American people is to stop terrorists from attacking the U.S.? Then, who are the terrorists? According to Obama’s admin, they are not Muslims. Then who are they looking for?

Well, according to DHS, they are Iraq and Afghanistan war veterans, right wing, religious, people who believe in the Bible and guns, and patriots.

If such spying is so necessary, why then American Mosques are off limits? Considering that Mosques are breading ground for radicalized Muslims. This in itself is an outrage.  To spy on every American and not the institution that train and brain wash Jihadists?  Can you imagine the U.S. government in 1939-1945 spy on and investigate every American but not Nazi training center in America? This would never happen.

One must also ask, why would the U.S. government do this? You have to see the pattern of the Obama’s administration support of the Muslim Brotherhood (MB) agenda and allowing the infiltration of MB agents into high level of the American government.

This is a very clear and present national security danger to the American people by not having a watchful eye on the breading ground for Jihadists.  American government is fighting a very dangerous politically correct war that make the American people the enemy and the Jihadists are the innocent. ATT0000112


It is very clear that the American government from both sides of the isle has been and remains a pro-Islamic agenda since 2009, this policy has been advanced at the speed of light.  Any American freedom-loving citizen would like to have his government be his/her protector from any enemy whether domestic or foreign.  Unfortunately, this is not the case with the current administration.  Here are some of the Muslim Brotherhood agents who have been appointed to a high-level government posts that would undermine American freedoms and national security:

  • Arif Alikhan – Assistant Secretary for Policy Development for the U.S. Department of Homeland Security
  • Mohammed Elibiary – Homeland Security Adviser
  • Rashad Hussain – Special Envoy to the Organization of the Islamic Conference (OIC)
  • Salam al-Marayati – Obama Adviser – founder Muslim Public Affairs Council and its current executive director
  • Imam Mohamed Magid – Obama’s Sharia Czar – Islamic Society of North America
  • Eboo Patel – Advisory Council on Faith-Based Neighborhood Partnerships

As an American patriot, you must contact your Congressmen and Senators. Demand of them to stop this infiltration by Muslim Brotherhood infiltration and for the FBI to keep an eye on every Mosque in America.  America is worth fighting for.


Salute the Danish Flag – It’s a Symbol of Western Freedom

Salute the Danish Flag – It’s a Symbol of Western Freedom

Family Security Matters
By Susan MacAllen

In Denmark, once-liberal immigration policies have forced huge governmental change and zero tolerance for Muslim immigrants intent on turning Denmark into an Islamic welfare haven. FSM Contributing Editor Susan MacAllen reveals a shocking reaction there and lessons America must learn.

In 1978-9 I was living and studying in Denmark. An elderly woman to whom I was close said something to me one day that puzzled me for many years after. I forget what the context of our conversation was, but she commented that I – as a young American in Denmark – should not let any Dane scold me about the way America had treated its black population, because the Danes in her view treated their immigrants at least as badly. I wasn’t sure which immigrants she meant, so I asked her. She answered that she meant those from the Middle East.

But in 1978 – even in Copenhagen, one didn’t see these Muslim immigrants. The Danish population embraced visitors, celebrated the exotic, went out of its way to protect each of its citizens. It was proud of its new brand of socialist liberalism – one in development since the conservatives had lost power in 1929 – a system where no worker had to struggle to survive, where one ultimately could count upon the state as in, perhaps, no other western nation at the time. The rest of Europe saw the Scandinavians as free-thinking, progressive and infinitely generous in their welfare policies. Denmark boasted low crime rates, devotion to the environment, a superior educational system and a history of humanitarianism.

Denmark was also most generous in its immigration policies – it offered the best welcome in Europe to the new immigrant: generous welfare payments from first arrival plus additional perks in transportation, housing and education. It was determined to set a world example for inclusiveness and multiculturalism. How could it have predicted that one day in 2005 a series of political cartoons in a newspaper would spark violence that would leave dozens dead in the streets – all because its commitment to multiculturalism would come back to bite?

By the 1990’s the growing urban Muslim population was obvious – and its unwillingness to integrate into Danish society was obvious. Years of immigrants had settled into Muslim-exclusive enclaves. As the Muslim leadership became more vocal about what they considered the decadence of Denmark’s liberal way of life, the Danes – once so welcoming – began to feel slighted. Many Danes had begun to see Islam as incompatible with their long-standing values: belief in personal liberty and free speech, in equality for women, in tolerance for other ethnic groups, and a deep pride in Danish heritage and history.

The New York Post in 2002 ran an article by Daniel Pipes and Lars Hedegaard, in which they forecasted accurately that the growing immigrant problem in Denmark would explode. In the article they reported:

· “Muslim immigrants…constitute 5 percent of the population but consume upwards of 40 percent of the welfare spending.”

· “Muslims are only 4 percent of Denmark’s 5.4 million people but make up a majority of the country’s convicted rapists, an especially combustible issue given that practically all the female victims are non-Muslim. Similar, if lesser, disproportions are found in other crimes.”

· “Over time, as Muslim immigrants increase in numbers, they wish less to mix with the indigenous population. A recent survey finds that only 5 percent of young Muslim immigrants would readily marry a Dane.”

· “Forced marriages – promising a newborn daughter in Denmark to a male cousin in the home country, then compelling her to marry him, sometimes on pain of death – are one problem…”

· “Muslim leaders openly declare their goal of introducing Islamic law once Denmark’s Muslim population grows large enough – a not-that-remote prospect. If present trends persist, one sociologist estimates, every third inhabitant of Denmark in 40 years will be Muslim.”

It is easy to understand why a growing number of Danes would feel that Muslim immigrants show little respect for Danish values and laws. An example is the phenomenon common to other European countries and the U.S.: some Muslims in Denmark who opted to leave the Muslim faith have been murdered in the name of Islam, while others hide in fear for their lives. Jews are also threatened and harassed openly by Muslim leaders in Denmark, a country where once Christian citizens worked to smuggle out nearly all of their 7,000 Jews by night to Sweden – before the Nazis could invade. I think of my Danish friend Elsa – who as a teenager had dreaded crossing the street to the bakery every morning under the eyes of occupying Nazi soldiers – and I wonder what she would say today.

In 2001, Denmark elected the most conservative government in some 70 years – one that had some decidedly non-generous ideas about liberal unfettered immigration. Today Denmark has the strictest immigration policies in Europe. ( Its effort to protect itself has been met with accusations of “racism” by liberal media across Europe – even as other governments struggle to right the social problems wrought by years of too-lax immigration.) If you wish to become Danish, you must attend three years of language classes. You must pass a test on Denmark’s history, culture, and a Danish language test. You must live in Denmark for 7 years before applying for citizenship. You must demonstrate an intent to work, and have a job waiting. If you wish to bring a spouse into Denmark, you must both be over 24 years of age, and you won’t find it so easy anymore to move your friends and family to Denmark with you. You will not be allowed to build a mosque in Copenhagen. Although your children have a choice of some 30 Arabic culture and language schools in Denmark, they will be strongly encouraged to assimilate to Danish society in ways that past immigrants weren’t.

In 2006, the Danish minister for employment, Claus Hjort Frederiksen, spoke publicly of the burden of Muslim immigrants on the Danish welfare system, and it was horrifying: the government’s welfare committee had calculated that if immigration from Third World countries were blocked, 75 percent of the cuts needed to sustain the huge welfare system in coming decades would be unnecessary. In other words, the welfare system as it existed was being exploited by immigrants to the point of eventually bankrupting the government. “We are simply forced to adopt a new policy on immigration. The calculations of the welfare committee are terrifying and show how unsuccessful the integration of immigrants has been up to now,” he said.

A large thorn in the side of Denmark’s imams is the Minister of Immigration and Integration, Rikke Hvilshoj. She makes no bones about the new policy toward immigration, “The number of foreigners coming to the country makes a difference,” Hvilshøj says, “There is an inverse correlation between how many come here and how well we can receive the foreigners that come.” And on Muslim immigrants needing to demonstrate a willingness to blend in, “In my view, Denmark should be a country with room for different cultures and religions. Some values, however, are more important than others. We refuse to question democracy, equal rights, and freedom of speech.”

Hvilshoj has paid a price for her show of backbone. Perhaps to test her resolve, the leading radical imam in Denmark, Ahmed Abdel Rahman Abu Laban, demanded that the government pay blood money to the family of a Muslim who was murdered in a suburb of Copenhagen, stating that the family’s thirst for revenge could be thwarted for money. When Hvilshoj dismissed his demand, he argued that in Muslim culture the payment of retribution money was common, to which Hvilshoj replied that what is done in a Muslim country is not necessarily what is done in Denmark. The Muslim reply came soon after: her house was torched while she, her husband and children slept. All managed to escape unharmed, but she and her family were moved to a secret location and she and other ministers were assigned bodyguards for the first time – in a country where such murderous violence was once so scarce.

Her government has slid to the right, and her borders have tightened. Many believe that what happens in the next decade will determine whether Denmark survives as a bastion of good living, humane thinking and social responsibility, or whether it becomes a nation at civil war with supporters of Sharia law. And meanwhile, Americans clamor for stricter immigration policies, and demand an end to state welfare programs that allow many immigrants to live on the public dole. As we in America look at the enclaves of Muslims amongst us, and see those who enter our shores too easily, dare live on our taxes, yet refuse to embrace our culture, respect our traditions, participate in our legal system, obey our laws, speak our language, appreciate our history . . . we would do well to look to Denmark, and say a prayer for her future and for our own.

# # contributing editor Susan MacAllen writes a political blog,, and has written on an extensive array of subjects for over 20 years. She has lived overseas and been intimately involved in the French culture since the Muslim immigrant population emerged in the south of France.
read full author bio here


New Iran president thanks ‘messiah’ for victory Anticipates coming prophet to conquer for Islam, kill all infidels



New Iran president thanks ‘messiah’ for victory

Anticipates coming prophet to conquer for Islam, kill all infidels

author-imageby Reza Kahlili Email | Archive

Reza Kahlili, author of the award-winning book “A Time to Betray,” served in CIA Directorate of Operations, as a spy in the Iranian Revolutionary Guard, counterterrorism expert; currently serves on the Task Force on National and Homeland Security, an advisory board to Congress and the advisory board of the Foundation for Democracy in Iran (FDI). He regularly appears in national and international media as an expert on Iran and counterterrorism inMore ↓Less ↑



Iran’s newly elected president, Hassan Rohani, attributed his victory in the June 15 voting to the 12th Imam, Mahdi, a statement with ominous overtones in the Islamic regime’s quest for nuclear weapons.

The Shiites believe that at the end of times, the 12th Imam, a 9th-century prophet, will reappear with Jesus Christ at his side, kill all the infidels and raise the flag of Islam in all four corners of the world. Many analysts believe Iran is seeking nuclear capability to bring on that Armageddon.

“This political [election] was due to the kindness of the last Islamic messiah [Mahdi],” Rohani said Friday.

Kayhan newspaper, the main media outlet of the regime and the mouthpiece of the supreme leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, ran a centerpiece headline Saturday reporting Rohani’s statement:

“This victory and the epic saga is without a doubt due to the special kindness of the Imam Zaman (Mahdi) and the measures taken by the supreme leader, especially his guidance and words. … Without his management then it was not clear if the people of Iran would witness such a day filled with joy,” Rohani said.

“I am so happy that there is a feeling of joy in our society and that the election took place in the month of Shaban [the 8th Islamic month, representative of courage and blessings], which is the month of victory,” he said.

Become a part of the investigative reporting team uncovering the truths about Iran, and get author Reza Kahlili’s “A Time to Betray” about his life as a double agent inside Iran’s Revolutionary Guards.

Much of the Western media in reporting on the election results proclaimed that Rohani is a “moderate and reformist” cleric.

An op-ed in the Los Angeles Times by David Horsey, for example, called Rohani’s election good for America and bad for the “neocons.” A piece in the Huffington Post by Flynt and Hillary Leverett, long-time supporters of dialogue with the Islamic regime, urged President Obama to approach Rohani as this represents a new opportunity, but the U.S. must accept the legitimacy of the Islamic Republic. A third op-ed, in the Christian Science Monitor by Scott Peterson, called Rohani a “diplomat sheikh” and claimed that he has shown flexibility and a willingness to compromise when he served as the regime’s nuclear negotiator.

An exclusive WND report on June 16, however, showed that Rohani has been a major player in the regime’s deceitful policies. He was put in charge of Iran’s nuclear team in 2003 by Khamenei and the so-called moderate president at that time, Mohammad Khatami. He succeeded in preventing further U.N. resolutions by agreeing to suspend parts of Iran’s nuclear activity, but, as the International Atomic Energy Agency indicated, Iran’s nuclear program never truly stopped.

In 2008, Abdollah Ramezanzadeh, the former parliamentary speaker and secretary of the Iranian government during Khatami’s term, revealed that while Khatami was president and through Rohani’s efforts, “We had an agreement for the suspension of enrichment, but we were importing all the necessary parts for our nuclear activity. We were conducting our policies on two fronts: one to continue negotiations openly and keep the Americans away from such negotiations, and the other to continue our nuclear activities in secret.”

Previous statements by the president-elect clearly show his radical views. Rohani had called the 2009 Iranian protesters of corrupt elections “thugs” and said that, “If the regime had not acted, the revolutionary forces (plainclothes police) would have put the protesters in their place.”

In 2009, millions of Iranians protested against the election fraud that gave Mahmoud Ahmadinejad a second term. Thousands were arrested and many tortured, raped and executed.

Rohani made a similar statement about the 1999 student uprising: “These students are so despised and inferior that they could not be labeled as a movement to change the regime. If the officials had not prohibited (the students from rioting), our people would have cut them in pieces.”

A Revolutionary Guard intelligence analyst who has defected to a Scandinavian country predicted the selection of Rohani as the next president one week before the election and said the regime constantly creates an image of division within its political system between so-called conservatives and moderates. The aim of tapping the perceived moderate Rohani as the winner was to deceive the West yet again by creating new hope that there could be meaningful negotiations over Iran’s illicit nuclear program, he said, while buying even more time to develop nuclear weapons and thereby becoming untouchable by the West.

The fact that Rohani served as the representative of the supreme leader to the Supreme National Security Council since 1989, the defector said, shows that the supreme leader regards him as one of the regime’s most trusted figures. But more importantly, since all of the regime’s actions, from its nuclear activity to arming terrorists and its terrorist activities, are decided by that council, there is no doubt that Rohani participated in all of its terrorist decision-making.

Some of those decisions include the 1994 Jewish Community Center bombing in Buenos Aires, the 1996 Khobar Tower bombings in Saudi Arabia and the 2012 Burgas, Bulgaria, bus bombing.

Ayatollah Movahedi Kermani, in his Friday prayer speech last week congratulating Rohani for his election, stated that, “Before the reappearance of Imam Zaman [Mahdi], the struggle will reach its peak … in that fight there won’t even be mercy on the womb in the mother’s belly.”

Reza Kahlili translated this Iranian video about Islamic prophecies of a coming messiah and the destruction of Israel and America:


© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved.

Congressman: Ad ‘racist’ because Most Wanted Terrorists all Muslim


Congressman: Ad ‘racist’ because Most Wanted Terrorists all Muslim

‘Baghdad Jim’ complains of FBI effort to elicit tips from citizens

author-imageby Art Moore Email | Archive

Art Moore entered the media world as a public relations assistant for the Seattle Mariners and a correspondent covering pro and college sports for Associated Press Radio. He reported for a daily newspaper and served as senior news writer for Christianity Today magazine before joining WND shortly after 9/11. He holds a master’s degree in communications from Wheaton College Graduate School.More ↓Less ↑



SEATTLE – An ad on Seattle buses placed by the FBI that shows the faces of 16 wanted terrorists is racist, because all of the men appear to be Muslim, charges Rep. Jim McDermott, D-Wash.

McDermott is known to some critics on the right as “Baghdad Jim” for stating on Iraqi soil in the run-up to the war that he essentially trusted dictator Saddam Hussein more than President Bush, whom he called a liar. The trip later was discovered to be financed by Saddam’s intelligence agency. When Saddam was captured, the congressman accused the administration of having waited until the opportune time politically to seize the Iraqi leader.

The Seattle Weekly reports McDermott sent a letter to the FBI requesting that the agency remove an ad that shows 16 faces of Most Wanted Terrorists, who all appear to be Muslim.

McDermott, whose district covers much of the Seattle area, calls the ad “offensive to Muslims and ethnic minorities,” contending it “encourages racial and religious profiling.”

He argues the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list includes people of other races and “associations with other religions and causes.”

“But their faces are missing from this campaign,” he writes.

Thirty of the 32 people listed on the FBI’s Most Wanted Terrorists list appear to be Muslim. The two non-Muslims are a member of the revolutionary Black Liberation Army who escaped from prison after being sentenced in 1973 and an animal-rights extremist wanted for a 2003 bombing.

The congressman, who has served Washington’s 7th District for 24 years, asserts the ad will “likely only serve to exacerbate the disturbing trend against Middle Eastern, South Asian and Muslim Americans.”

The ad by the Puget Sound Joint Terrorism Task Force is part of the U.S. Department of State’s Rewards for Justice Program announced June 4, which offers up to $25 million for information that helps stop terrorism.

The task force is an initiative of the FBI that employs the resources and skills of local law enforcement to prevent acts of terrorism and to solve terrorism cases.

A joint news release of the FBI and the State Department about the rewards program said members of Seattle’s community “have time and time again shown themselves to be concerned about protecting their families, their neighbors, and their freedom.”

“Many despicable plots from illicit drug trafficking to violent acts of terrorism have come to the FBI’s attention because vigilant Seattleites came forward with a tip,” the statement says.

Trusting Saddam

McDermott traveled in 2002 to Baghdad with then-Rep. David Bonior, D-Mich., and Rep. Mike Thompson, Calif., to argue against the U.S. going to war to oust Saddam.

Democratic Reps. David Bonior and Jim McDermott interviewed by ABC News in Baghdad in 2002.

With a Baghdad mosque in the background, the Democrat told ABC’s George Stephanopoulos in a television interview through a satellite link that Americans “have to take the Iraqis on their face value.”

Stephanopolous, the former top presidential aide to Bill Clinton, asked McDermott: “Before you left for Baghdad, you said the president of the United States will lie to the American people in order to get us into this war. Do you really believe that?”

At the end of a long reply, McDermott concluded: “I think the president would mislead the American people.”

Oklahoma Sen. Don Nickles, the No. 2 ranking Republican at the time, said the congressmen  “sound somewhat like spokespersons for the Iraqi government.”

In 2008, a federal indictment unsealed in Detroit charged that Saddam’s intelligence agency secretly financed a trip to Iraq for three U.S. lawmakers. The indictment didn’t name the lawmakers, but the dates correspond to the trip by McDermott and his two Democrat colleagues.

Muthanna Al-Hanooti, a member of a Michigan nonprofit group, was charged with arranging the trip at the behest of Saddam’s regime and paying for it through an intermediary.

“Obviously we didn’t know it at the time,” McDermott spokesman Michael DeCesare told the Associated Press. “The trip was to see the plight of the Iraqi children. That’s the only reason we went.”

McDermott was accompanied on the Baghdad trip by an Iraqi-American businessman who admitted to financial ties with Saddam’s regime. In 2004, McDermott returned a $5,000 contribution the Iraqi made to the congressman’s campaign fund.

Former FBI officials told WND in 2003 that Bonior previously hampered FBI efforts to investigate terrorist suspects in Detroit, which became a hotbed for al-Qaida sympathizers and cells.

‘Bush timed Saddam capture for political advantage’

In December 2003, after American forces captured Saddam, McDermott told a Seattle radio interviewer that the U.S. could have captured the Iraqi dictator “a long time ago if they wanted.”

KIRO radio’s Dave Ross asked McDermott whether the capture was timed to help President Bush.

“Yeah. Oh, yeah. There’s too much by happenstance for it to be just a coincidental thing,” McDermott said.

Ross, who made an unsuccessful run for Congress as a Democrat, pressed further to be sure he understood McDermott’s point.

“I don’t know that it was definitely planned on this weekend,” the congressman said, “but I know they’ve been in contact with people all along who knew basically where he was. It was just a matter of time till they’d find him.

“It’s funny, when they’re having all this trouble,” he said, “suddenly they have to roll out something.”

© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved.

TrentoVision – 6.17.13 – “JIHAD” ON INTERSTATE 95 – We Were There!

TrentoVision – 6.17.13 – “JIHAD” ON INTERSTATE 95 – We Were There!

Published on Jun 17, 2013

On Saturday June 15 someone spray-painted – JIHAD – the Arabic word for “Holy War,” on a sound barrier wall in Delray Beach, Florida.The word JIHAD was 20 feet high and 60 feet wide! This particular wall bordered an African-American neighborhood. Ironically,
Damon Rosen one of the TrentoVision producers, was driving on Interstate 95, saw the JIHAD, the police and stopped to cover the story for our TrentoVision show. Little did Damon know that he would soon become part of this JIHAD story as a near fight broke out between some local neighbors and a belligerent PRO-JIHAD supporter! Get the whole crazy story on our show today!

Survey: Many in Muslim World Want Shariah as Law of Land


            Survey: Many in Muslim World Want Shariah as Law of Land

            By: REUTERS

            Large majorities in the Muslim world want the Islamic legal and moral code of Shariah as the official law in their countries, but they disagree on what it includes and who should be subject to it, an extensive new survey says.

Over three-quarters of Muslims in the Middle East and North Africa, South Asia and Southeast Asia want Shariah courts to decide family law issues such as divorce and property disputes,  the Pew Forum on Religion and Public Life said on Tuesday.

Views on punishments such as chopping off thieves’ hands or decreeing death for apostates is more evenly divided in much of the Islamic world, although more than three-quarters of Muslims in South Asia say they are justified.

Those punishments have helped make Shariah controversial in some non-Islamic countries, where some critics say radical Muslims want to impose it on Western societies, but the survey shows views in Muslim countries are far from monolithic.

“Muslims are not equally comfortable with all aspects of Shariah,” said the study by the Washington-based Pew Forum. “Most do not believe it should be applied to non-Muslims.”

Unlike codified Western law, Shariah is a loosely defined set  of moral and legal guidelines based on the Koran, the sayings of Prophet Muhammad (hadith) and Muslim traditions. Its rules and advice cover everything from prayers to personal hygiene.

More than four-fifths of the 38,000 Muslims interviewed in 39 countries said non-Muslims in their countries could practice their faith freely and that this was good.

This view was strongest in South Asia, where 97 percent of Bangladeshis and 96 percent of Pakistanis agreed, while the lowest Middle Eastern result was 77 percent in Egypt.

The survey polled only Muslims and not minorities. In several Muslim countries, embattled Christian minorities say they cannot practice their faith freely and are, in fact, subject to discrimination and physical attacks.

The survey produced mixed results on questions relating to the relationship between politics and Islam.

Democracy wins slight majorities in key Middle Eastern states — 54 percent in Iraq, 55 percent in Egypt — and falls to 29 percent in Pakistan. By contrast, it stands at 81 percent in Lebanon, 75 percent in Tunisia, and 70 percent in Bangladesh.

In most countries surveyed, Muslims were more worried about Islamist extremism than any other form of religious violence.

Suicide bombing was mostly rejected, although it won 40 percent support in the Palestinian territories, 39 percent in Afghanistan, 29 percent in Eygpt and 26 percent in Bangladesh.

Three-quarters say abortion is morally wrong and 80 percent or more rejected homosexuality and sex outside of marriage.

Views on whether women should decide themselves if they should wear a headscarf vary greatly, from 89 percent in Tunisia  and 79 percent in Indonesia saying yes, and 45 percent in Iraq and 30 percent in Afghanistan saying no.

Majorities from 74 percent in Lebanon to 96 percent in Malaysia said wives should always obey their husbands.

Only a minority saw Sunni-Shi’ite tensions as a very big problem, ranging from 38 percent in Lebanon and 34 percent in Pakistan to 23 percent in Iraq and 14 percent in Turkey.

Conflict with other religions loomed larger, with 68 percent in Lebanon saying it was a big problem, 65 percent in Tunisia, 60 percent in Nigeria and 57 percent in Pakistan.

© 2013 Thomson/Reuters.  All rights reserved.

Islamists ‘staking claim’ with Maryland ‘cultural center’



Islamists ‘staking claim’ with Maryland ‘cultural center’

‘The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets’

author-imageby Michael Carl Email | Archive

Michael Carl is a veteran journalist with overseas military experience and experience as a political consultant. He also has two Master’s Degrees, is a bi-vocational pastor and lives with his family in the Northeast United States.More ↓Less ↑



On his visit to a new Turkish-funded mosque in Lanham, Md., Turkish Prime Minister Recep Tayip Erodogan said his government chose the site because of its location in “free territory.”

He said when he attended the groundbreaking of the 15-acre, $100 million mega-mosque  that the Turkish-American Cultural Center likely will become “the largest and most striking examples of Islamic architecture in the Western hemisphere when finished in 2014.”

But those seemingly innocuous words are alarming to a number of analysts, including former Palestinian operative Walid Shoebat, who says the West doesn’t realize the significance of what Erdogan was saying.

Shoebat said Erdogan’s true mission is to claim the land for Islam, and the evidence is in his words.

“The mosques are our barracks, the domes our helmets, the minarets our bayonets and the faithful our soldiers,” Shoebat said, quoting Erdogan.

“The West is unaware that in Islam, a mosque is an embassy and Turkey is acting stealthily, which is why the project is not arousing much alarm,” Shoebat said.

Islam analyst and Atlas Shrugs blogger Pamela Geller agrees. Most Americans don’t know that the plans showcase Turkey’s long-held territorial dream, she said.

“The Turks are trying to restore the glory of the Ottoman period. They may be staking a claim to be the leaders of Sunni Islam worldwide, as they were in the days of the last caliphate,” Geller said.

Clarion Project intelligence analyst Ryan Mauro noted that Turkey’s influence is largely under the radar.

He said Turkey is quietly spreading its influence in the U.S.

Shoebat said the Turkish plan coincides with a plan by Fethullah Gulen, reported by Der Spiegel. Gulen is an operative who has been establishing charter schools around the U.S.

Shoebat cited a statement from Gulen: “Move in the arteries of the system without anyone noticing your existence until you reach all the power centers. Until the conditions are ripe, they (the followers) must continue like this. If they do something prematurely, the world will crush our heads, and Muslims will suffer everywhere.

“You must wait until such time as you have gotten all the state power. Until that time, any step taken would be too early – like breaking an egg without waiting the full 40 days for it to hatch. It would be like killing the chick inside.”

WND reported in February 2011 that Gulen was the leader of a 27-state, 100-charter school network that subtly teaches the students to hold a favorable view of Islam.

Koinonia Institute President Steven Elwart believes the indoctrination is subdued but intentional.

“There is a certain amount of an Islamic-centered slant to their teaching. One place they really start bringing in the slant is through their after-school programs and what they call their outside programs,” Elwart observed.

“For example, they’ll have Turkish festivals and the kids can compete in making costumes, writings and the like. Many times the prize for these in these competitions is a cultural trip to Turkey,” Elwart said.

Elwart believes that the Gulen charter schools are going largely unnoticed by the American public.

Mauro wrote in an analysis of the event that it’s significant that two members of Muslim Brotherhood front groups were also in attendance, Naeem Baig, president of the Islamic Circle of North America, or ICNA, and Mohamed Magid, president of the Islamic Society of North America, ISNA.

A 1991 U.S. Muslim Brotherhood memo lists ICNA as one of “our organizations and the organizations of our friends.” The memo says its “work” in America is “a kind of grand jihad in eliminating and destroying the Western civilization from within.”

Mauro noted the memo even refers to meetings with ICNA in which there was talk about a merger.

ISNA was also an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation case, the largest Islamic terror-funding trial in the history of the U.S.

Shoebat saidt Erdogan’s ambitions clearly extend past Maryland.

“But this is not only in Maryland that Erdogan’s narcissism and fascination with mega mosques is manifested. It appears to be moving toward allowing Hagia Sophia, now a museum, to be opened as a mosque, which only demonstrates his desire to present himself as Muhammad II who defeated Christianity,” Shoebat said.

“While the quietness of Erdogan’s stealth activities in Christendom’s arteries is understood; the deafening silence of the Western Christians is not, unless … the callousness and the falling away of Christians worldwide has reached it’s fullness and the sick man of Europe is about to rise from the dead and take Christendom’s historic glory,” Shoebat said.

“Erdogan through much deception is fulfilling one of his spiritual mentor’s dreams, Sheik Maulana Nazeem Kibrisi. While Turkey paints its version of Islam to be Sufi, which the West deceitfully believes is moderate, the Sufi scholar was found in Turkish speaking with the fervor of Adolf Hitler,” Shoebat said.

Kibrisi was no small-time Sufi. In a speech given in Germany more than a decade ago to Turkish students, with tens of thousands gathered – including Erdogan present, Kibrisi said:

Glory and blessing to the Lord of the two worlds who is the cause of these days. Definitely, the victory belongs to Islam. This flood of people here is a sign of the rise of the glorious Islam. Do they not think that this a great sign? When the great sign appears [Mahdi] the world will shake.

Our forefathers made the earth tremble. This gathering is a memento from our forefathers. … You are the grandsons of the Ottomans who will make the world tremble again. If the Ottomans do not come back the unbelievers will never be brought down to their knees … history is made of recurrences, certainly our glorious era has come, the day being born belongs to Islam … as long as we have Allah we do not need America, nor do we need the unbelievers in Europe, nor do we need the unbelievers nor will we go their path.

Shoebat said that while the West is putting its attention on Iran’s president, Turkish leadership is filling in the gaps.

“While the West over-focused on Iran’s Ahmadinejad and his aspiration to usher in the Twelfth Imam, the West believed the myth, that Mahdism with it’s messianic aspiration was only restricted to Shia, yet, our two-decade old prediction that Turkey desired to take the realm of Islamdom has now become reality with Mahdism to soon follow,” Shoebat said.

“Erdogan’s desire to fulfill Kibrisi’s dream of the ‘rise of the glorious Islam’ is not only some rhetoric by an imam who has gone mad, it is the metamorphosis of Erdogan’s Ottoman dream, which reflects Kibrisi’s Sufi spirit expressed during his victory speech,” Shoebat said.

“Today, no serious historian or political analyst can deny it, even the cooperation of the United States to help create such an empire is confessed by historians who are beginning to see that the powers, which held this Ottoman Humpty Dumpty were taken out of the way,” Shoebat said.

“Erdogan tells the more than 50 Muslim states O.I.C (Organization of Islamic Cooperation) a remarkable statement, it was not that Jerusalem is the apple of God’s eye, but that Jerusalem is the apple of the eye of every Muslim,” Shoebat said, referring to Erdogan’s statement.

“This was no rhetoric. Erdogan plans to visit Gaza to bolster Hamas to take power. But how will he do this without being detected by Israel’s radar that will cry out ‘foul’? What is coming soon I predict will be headline news that Erdogan will arm-twist Hamas to recognize Israel and even bring Israel and Egypt for a peace party in Cairo in which by peace he will deceive many,” Shoebat said.

“After all, who could say no to peace?” Shoebat said.

© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved.

IRS exempts terror front group over tea party



IRS exempts terror front group over tea party

Reinstated despite years of delinquent filings


At the same time the Internal Revenue Service delayed or denied requests for tax-exempt status from hundreds of conservative non-profit groups, it was quietly restoring the tax-exempt status of an Islamist front group accused of collaborating with terrorists.

Last year, the politicized agency reinstated the Washington-based Council on American-Islamic Relations’ tax-exempt status despite years of delinquent tax filings. CAIR officials had met with officials inside the White House before the decision was made.

Though Democrat-connected CAIR did not officially endorse Obama, many of its staffers helped turn out the Muslim vote for his re-election. CAIR boasted that its own polling showed more than 85 percent of Muslim-Americans voted for Obama.

In 2011, the IRS stripped the group’s national office of its nonprofit status for failure to file annual tax reports as required by federal law.

The moved followed requests by then-Rep. Sue Myrick, R-N.C., and other congressional leaders asking the IRS to investigate after the 2009 bestseller “Muslim Mafia” called attention to CAIR’s missing IRS filings and foreign donations.

Fight back against CAIR’s attack on First Amendment by making a contribution to WND’s “Legal Defense Fund.” Donations of $25 or more entitle you to free copy of “Muslim Mafia” – the book so devastating to CAIR the group is trying to ban it.

During the years CAIR failed to disclose its donors to the government, it solicited funds from Libya, Sudan and other terror-sponsoring foreign governments, according to “Muslim Mafia.” CAIR is not registered as a foreign agent.

CAIR repeatedly failed to file its annual disclosure report, IRS Form 990. CAIR blames a clerical error for the delinquency and claims to have completed the forms. However, several news organizations, including and Gannett Co., have asked CAIR for the 2007-2010 documents, and CAIR has not been able to produce them.

“Given CAIR’s status as an unindicted co-conspirator in the Holy Land Foundation terror-financing case, this failure to comply with federal disclosure laws is all the more troubling,” U.S. Rep. Frank Wolf, the co-chairman of the Congressional Human Rights Caucus, wrote the IRS in a separate request for investigation in 2011.

CAIR’s terrorist ties run deep. The Justice Department lists it among U.S. front groups for Hamas, a Palestinian terrorist organization. And several CAIR officials have been convicted or deported on terrorism-related charges.

The FBI says that until suspicious ties between the leadership of CAIR and that of Hamas are resolved, it will no longer work with CAIR as a partner in counter-terrorism efforts.

Despite these red flags, the IRS in June 2012 sent CAIR-Foundation Inc. a letter stating the controversial nonprofit had regained its tax-exempt
status as a 501(c)3. At the same time, the IRS demanded tea party and other patriot groups turn over donor rolls, membership lists and contacts with political figures, among other things, before the agency would consider granting tax-exempt status to them.

CAIR Foundation, which is listed at the same 453 New Jersey Ave. address as CAIR’s national headquarters in Washington, told the Washington Post that “all the paperwork issues have been resolved” concerning the organization.

However, WND has obtained CAIR-Foundation Inc.’s latest filing, and even this tax document is incomplete. It is a partial return for the calendar year 2011, covering only the period from Aug. 9, 2011, to Dec. 31, 2011. The final page of the return, in fact, requests an extension from the IRS.

“Additional time is required to obtain information necessary in filing a complete and accurate return,” states CAIR’s accountant Joey Musmar.

The filing says the organization solicited $3,964,990 in gifts, grants and other contributions that “were not tax deductible.” An annual fundraiser raised a net $106,879.

At the beginning of 2011, CAIR’s liabilities exceeded its assets by $940,279.

It also owed “CAIR Inc.” $722,261 for “charity consulting.” This amount is listed as a “loan.” CAIR Inc. is listed as a “C Corp.”

CAIR insists its tax returns for 2007-2010 exist. Yet it still won’t produce them, despite repeated requests. According to the IRS, nonprofits must make their tax returns available to the public upon request.

CAIR lists Todd Gallinger, director of chapter development, as its contact for such matters, at (202) 488-8787 and

It’s not clear what, if anything, the IRS investigated concerning CAIR’s filings. The agency did not respond to requests for comment.

© Copyright 1997-2013. All Rights Reserved.